<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How we Communicate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robrhinehart.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261</link>
	<description>Can entropy be reversed?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 02:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	I&#039;m inspired by your thought processes. Soylent aside, it&#039;s really a great collection of thoughts you have here. Your writing style is also unusually clear. It&#039;s a rare gift. Coupled with fascinating concepts, it&#039;s a pleasure to read.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	I&#039;m inspired by your thought processes. Soylent aside, it&#039;s really a great collection of thoughts you have here. Your writing style is also unusually clear. It&#039;s a rare gift. Coupled with fascinating concepts, it&#039;s a pleasure to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	Our sences pickup mutch more data that&#160;we can process ourselfs, but even the fraction that&#160;we do process IS already much larger than what modern computer can analyzer on the same level as we do in&#160;real-tme.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	Our sences pickup mutch more data that&nbsp;we can process ourselfs, but even the fraction that&nbsp;we do process IS already much larger than what modern computer can analyzer on the same level as we do in&nbsp;real-tme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	@Jeff



	I agree with you a lot. I&#039;ve noticed that when I&#039;m debating it seems like I understand speech a lot better, oddly enough. But where I disagree with you is that if we made our language more efficient there wouldn&#039;t be any communication issues between anyone.
	
	For example, often I&#039;m given vague instructions where the speaker assumes I hear their thoughts. This can lead some (sometimes) embarrassing performances on my part. (&quot;Can you get that?&quot; &quot;You mean this?&quot; &quot;No, dummy, the broom not the box!&quot;)
	
	As simple as this break in communication is, I think we could be more efficient. Most of these problems exist in the way we speak, though, not in the limits of our communication.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	@Jeff</p>
<p>	I agree with you a lot. I&#039;ve noticed that when I&#039;m debating it seems like I understand speech a lot better, oddly enough. But where I disagree with you is that if we made our language more efficient there wouldn&#039;t be any communication issues between anyone.</p>
<p>	For example, often I&#039;m given vague instructions where the speaker assumes I hear their thoughts. This can lead some (sometimes) embarrassing performances on my part. (&quot;Can you get that?&quot; &quot;You mean this?&quot; &quot;No, dummy, the broom not the box!&quot;)</p>
<p>	As simple as this break in communication is, I think we could be more efficient. Most of these problems exist in the way we speak, though, not in the limits of our communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	I&#039;m a bit hesitant of increasing the efficiency of our language. Having that low information density lets me think while I&#039;m talking. I feel like if we could &quot;transcend language&quot; I&#039;d be making a lot more faux pas than if I had that buffer time. :)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	I&#039;m a bit hesitant of increasing the efficiency of our language. Having that low information density lets me think while I&#039;m talking. I feel like if we could &quot;transcend language&quot; I&#039;d be making a lot more faux pas than if I had that buffer time. <img src="http://robrhinehart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derryl</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=261#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	&#160;


	Great article, I love examining parallels like this.


	&#160;


	I would argue that we don&#039;t exactly wait &quot;random&quot; amounts of time before attempting to speak again. Instead we continuously ping the other active nodes to determine whether they&#039;re still busy or if they can receive more packets (we do this using our eyes and ears). However there&#039;s certainly some sort of circadian rhythm going on... when the would-be-speaker is suddenly reminded about the thing they were going to say, a few minutes later and with no conscious reason for it.


	&#160;


	Also, we can only increase our power level so much... Goku on the other hand --&gt; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiMHTK15Pik
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	&nbsp;</p>
<p>	Great article, I love examining parallels like this.</p>
<p>	&nbsp;</p>
<p>	I would argue that we don&#039;t exactly wait &quot;random&quot; amounts of time before attempting to speak again. Instead we continuously ping the other active nodes to determine whether they&#039;re still busy or if they can receive more packets (we do this using our eyes and ears). However there&#039;s certainly some sort of circadian rhythm going on&#8230; when the would-be-speaker is suddenly reminded about the thing they were going to say, a few minutes later and with no conscious reason for it.</p>
<p>	&nbsp;</p>
<p>	Also, we can only increase our power level so much&#8230; Goku on the other hand &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiMHTK15Pik" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiMHTK15Pik</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
