<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soylent Funding Announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robrhinehart.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034</link>
	<description>Can entropy be reversed?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CattleHerder</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CattleHerder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a start. It&#039;s already far from a pet project. Sometimes, science has to play catch-up with stupid, naive experiments. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a start. It&#8217;s already far from a pet project. Sometimes, science has to play catch-up with stupid, naive experiments. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhr215</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhr215]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if its anecdotal its basically useless. If he were part of a legitimate research team (you know, with people trained biology research) conducting randomized double-blind placebo controlled studies, that would be much much more interesting. As far as I can tell he&#039;s just some random guy with no qualifications whatsoever that has decided to make his own meal replacement and market the hell out of it. That&#039;s fine. But let&#039;s not pretend that&#039;s science. Its some dude&#039;s pet project. So be it. Let&#039;s not pretend its the second coming of Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if its anecdotal its basically useless. If he were part of a legitimate research team (you know, with people trained biology research) conducting randomized double-blind placebo controlled studies, that would be much much more interesting. As far as I can tell he&#8217;s just some random guy with no qualifications whatsoever that has decided to make his own meal replacement and market the hell out of it. That&#8217;s fine. But let&#8217;s not pretend that&#8217;s science. Its some dude&#8217;s pet project. So be it. Let&#8217;s not pretend its the second coming of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CattleHerder</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CattleHerder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, biology is extremely complex and the understanding is limited, but the studies alone without blind and even foolhardy experimentation are a guarantee the progress will keep moving at a glacial pace. 

The biggest thing about Rob&#039;s project, IMO, is that many people are willing to take risks experimenting with the ingredients, providing a base for the same studies (even if the evidence is incomplete and anecdotal). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, biology is extremely complex and the understanding is limited, but the studies alone without blind and even foolhardy experimentation are a guarantee the progress will keep moving at a glacial pace. </p>
<p>The biggest thing about Rob&#8217;s project, IMO, is that many people are willing to take risks experimenting with the ingredients, providing a base for the same studies (even if the evidence is incomplete and anecdotal). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhr215</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhr215]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is we don&#039;t understand enough to know what to do differently. Almost every time we&#039;ve tried to isolate things from healthy foods it has turned out to have no beneficial effect and in some cases unhealthy effects.  The bottom line is our understanding is poor. Food is actually quite complex. The method of  picking nutrients and trying to control for them in the hopes of recreating the benefits of the whole food have been a disastrous failure. 


I&#039;m not saying its impossible, just that we don&#039;t know enough yet and the research is way way way behind the point where we can do this. It would be like saying &quot;why can&#039;t we just adjust neurons so that we are all geniuses.&quot; Maybe one day we can but we are like decades away from even understanding how the brain works beyond our primitive understanding of the function massive structures that contain literally trillions of nerve endings.


I appreciate your faith in technological innovation but you don&#039;t seem to appreciate how little we know. Our understanding is pretty basic. Biology is pretty complex. Its not a man-made software program where we know all the variables and can control them. We don&#039;t even know what the variables. We&#039;re trying to reverse engineer something WAY more complex than man has ever created. We&#039;re still trying to figure what it is inside these fruits and vegetables are so beneficial and in what combinations they are beneficial. 


Maybe some day, but not today. And I would suggest that trying to do this based on such limited understanding is much more likely to lead to sub-optimal and harmful results versus beneficial ones. So far that has been the case (eg lets isolate soy and make lots of food out of it, its so good for heart disease, oh weight it actually contributes to breast cancer... whoops!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is we don&#8217;t understand enough to know what to do differently. Almost every time we&#8217;ve tried to isolate things from healthy foods it has turned out to have no beneficial effect and in some cases unhealthy effects.  The bottom line is our understanding is poor. Food is actually quite complex. The method of  picking nutrients and trying to control for them in the hopes of recreating the benefits of the whole food have been a disastrous failure. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying its impossible, just that we don&#8217;t know enough yet and the research is way way way behind the point where we can do this. It would be like saying &#8220;why can&#8217;t we just adjust neurons so that we are all geniuses.&#8221; Maybe one day we can but we are like decades away from even understanding how the brain works beyond our primitive understanding of the function massive structures that contain literally trillions of nerve endings.</p>
<p>I appreciate your faith in technological innovation but you don&#8217;t seem to appreciate how little we know. Our understanding is pretty basic. Biology is pretty complex. Its not a man-made software program where we know all the variables and can control them. We don&#8217;t even know what the variables. We&#8217;re trying to reverse engineer something WAY more complex than man has ever created. We&#8217;re still trying to figure what it is inside these fruits and vegetables are so beneficial and in what combinations they are beneficial. </p>
<p>Maybe some day, but not today. And I would suggest that trying to do this based on such limited understanding is much more likely to lead to sub-optimal and harmful results versus beneficial ones. So far that has been the case (eg lets isolate soy and make lots of food out of it, its so good for heart disease, oh weight it actually contributes to breast cancer&#8230; whoops!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CattleHerder</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CattleHerder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re actually right about Myoplex, it is designed to replace meals (not just supplement). I was looking at a different product. 

That said, I&#039;m not sure why you keep assigning some kind of metaphysical attributes to the micronutrients. So they are destroyed when processed. Design a different way to process, or recreate these structures then! Or someone ruled that they are impossible to analyse?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re actually right about Myoplex, it is designed to replace meals (not just supplement). I was looking at a different product. </p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m not sure why you keep assigning some kind of metaphysical attributes to the micronutrients. So they are destroyed when processed. Design a different way to process, or recreate these structures then! Or someone ruled that they are impossible to analyse?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhr215</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhr215]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Myoplex is a meal replacement. Ensure is a meal replacement. They&#039;ve both been around for DECADES!  Millions of people live on these types of meal replacements exclusively for whatever reason (convenience, illness, time saving, etc.) Its been done and it exists and has for a long time.


All I am telling you is that every piece of medical and nutritional science on the planet having to do with food and nutrition says there is no substituting for actual fresh fruits and vegetables, particularly leafy greens. They are loaded thousands of different types of micronutrients which are destroyed when processed. And they work in combination so you can&#039;t just isolate one particular sub-compound and get the benefit of the whole. And the benefits are tremendous. Huge decreases in risk  factors for heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, pretty much every disease of civilization.


If you&#039;re getting the same message over and over its because you&#039;re not receiving the information. There is no magical processing technique that is going to magically reverse the laws of biology. 


Instead of hoping for some fantasy &quot;real food replacement&quot; why not study up on all the studies on nutrition which basically make it ABUNDANTLY clear that if you want to prevent disease the best course of action food-wise is to eat as many fresh fruits, vegetables, and leafy greens as possible. All the science agrees on this. Whether meat is necessary, or if grains are necessary, or how much fat is good, etc. is all debatable, the science is mixed. But there is literally no debate on the importance FRESH GREENS, VEGETABLES AND FRUITS.


Why is this so hard to comprehend. Processing of any kind kills the micro-nutrients. Yes you can still get carbs, protein, and fat. That&#039;s wonderful. And you can survive on it (i.e. Ensure Myoplex, etc.) but it does not replace the benefits of fresh fruits, greens, and vegetables. 


Personally I try to eat as much as that stuff as I can every day, because I&#039;m not looking simply for food that will sustain me but for food that will maximize my health.


If you just want simple meal replacement, go to McDonalds every day. Its food. Its quick. Its cheap. Its got all your basic needs covered.




Oy vey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myoplex is a meal replacement. Ensure is a meal replacement. They&#8217;ve both been around for DECADES!  Millions of people live on these types of meal replacements exclusively for whatever reason (convenience, illness, time saving, etc.) Its been done and it exists and has for a long time.</p>
<p>All I am telling you is that every piece of medical and nutritional science on the planet having to do with food and nutrition says there is no substituting for actual fresh fruits and vegetables, particularly leafy greens. They are loaded thousands of different types of micronutrients which are destroyed when processed. And they work in combination so you can&#8217;t just isolate one particular sub-compound and get the benefit of the whole. And the benefits are tremendous. Huge decreases in risk  factors for heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, pretty much every disease of civilization.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re getting the same message over and over its because you&#8217;re not receiving the information. There is no magical processing technique that is going to magically reverse the laws of biology. </p>
<p>Instead of hoping for some fantasy &#8220;real food replacement&#8221; why not study up on all the studies on nutrition which basically make it ABUNDANTLY clear that if you want to prevent disease the best course of action food-wise is to eat as many fresh fruits, vegetables, and leafy greens as possible. All the science agrees on this. Whether meat is necessary, or if grains are necessary, or how much fat is good, etc. is all debatable, the science is mixed. But there is literally no debate on the importance FRESH GREENS, VEGETABLES AND FRUITS.</p>
<p>Why is this so hard to comprehend. Processing of any kind kills the micro-nutrients. Yes you can still get carbs, protein, and fat. That&#8217;s wonderful. And you can survive on it (i.e. Ensure Myoplex, etc.) but it does not replace the benefits of fresh fruits, greens, and vegetables. </p>
<p>Personally I try to eat as much as that stuff as I can every day, because I&#8217;m not looking simply for food that will sustain me but for food that will maximize my health.</p>
<p>If you just want simple meal replacement, go to McDonalds every day. Its food. Its quick. Its cheap. Its got all your basic needs covered.</p>
<p>Oy vey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CattleHerder</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CattleHerder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I probably should downvote the whole thread, because this is like a broken record that keeps going on. Can&#039;t you guys read? 

These are performance meals and medical foods. Note the word COMPLETE in caps. I keep asking the other folks with the same argument the same question, and they again point to supplements. 

&quot;Nothing is a replacement for real food&quot;. Duh! This is what the project is about, to come up with a replacement for real food. Not supplements. 

Do the fruits and vegetables contain some kind of metaphysical substance that can&#039;t be analysed? Like &quot;planes are stupid because only the birds can fly&quot;? 

Why would anyone need a replacement for real food? Plenty of reasons. Custom-tailored optimised nutrition, preservation of natural resources, even space exploration. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably should downvote the whole thread, because this is like a broken record that keeps going on. Can&#8217;t you guys read? </p>
<p>These are performance meals and medical foods. Note the word COMPLETE in caps. I keep asking the other folks with the same argument the same question, and they again point to supplements. </p>
<p>&#8220;Nothing is a replacement for real food&#8221;. Duh! This is what the project is about, to come up with a replacement for real food. Not supplements. </p>
<p>Do the fruits and vegetables contain some kind of metaphysical substance that can&#8217;t be analysed? Like &#8220;planes are stupid because only the birds can fly&#8221;? </p>
<p>Why would anyone need a replacement for real food? Plenty of reasons. Custom-tailored optimised nutrition, preservation of natural resources, even space exploration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhr215</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhr215]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I eat real food so I couldn&#039;t tell you. I&#039;m not sure the differences among them are greater than the differences between synthesized meal replacements and real food. But there is Myoplex by EAS, which is widely used. Its a meal replacement designed by the Body For Life guy. There is also Ensure, which is what doctor&#039;s recommend for Alzheimers and Dementia patents who can&#039;t eat. Both are well rounded in terms of macro-nutrients and you can certainly live off of it.


But I hate to tell you, nothing is a replacement for real food. Added Vitamins (like in Soylent) does not equal fruits and vegetables.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I eat real food so I couldn&#8217;t tell you. I&#8217;m not sure the differences among them are greater than the differences between synthesized meal replacements and real food. But there is Myoplex by EAS, which is widely used. Its a meal replacement designed by the Body For Life guy. There is also Ensure, which is what doctor&#8217;s recommend for Alzheimers and Dementia patents who can&#8217;t eat. Both are well rounded in terms of macro-nutrients and you can certainly live off of it.</p>
<p>But I hate to tell you, nothing is a replacement for real food. Added Vitamins (like in Soylent) does not equal fruits and vegetables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CattleHerder</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CattleHerder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been looking for these healthy shake COMPLETE meal replacements for years, including unsuccessfully asking on this very forum. Kindly point me to one (just one). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for these healthy shake COMPLETE meal replacements for years, including unsuccessfully asking on this very forum. Kindly point me to one (just one). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhr215</title>
		<link>http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhr215]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robrhinehart.com/?p=1034#comment-3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you talking about? Vanguard of human kind? Is this a joke? It a nutritional supplement. Its not curing cancer. Its a kid trying sell nutritional supplements. Hello, there are literally 1,000 of these healthy shake meal replacements already on the market. Oh my god.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about? Vanguard of human kind? Is this a joke? It a nutritional supplement. Its not curing cancer. Its a kid trying sell nutritional supplements. Hello, there are literally 1,000 of these healthy shake meal replacements already on the market. Oh my god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
